Memespace Names and URNs

Herbs lowest price drops were very important, and monasteries had extensive herb gardens to cheap betnovate produce herbs to resolve each imbalance humor. Christian teaching held asacol without prescription that people should provide hospitality for those in desperate need, estrace for sale including food, shelter, and medical care if necessary. This would canadian cialis have been an empirical observation, because at that time people viagra us had no idea that infections were caused by germs. Medical buy griseofulvin online historians believe Italian merchants brought it to Europe when they cheap prescription without prescription fled the fighting in Crimea. He became an expert in buy cialis low cost pharmacy anatomy and made studies of tendons, muscles, bones, and other buy synthroid features of the human body. Paré also revived the Greek method.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.