Memespace Names and URNs

The generic viagra no prescription jelly CDC state that vaccination is the best way for a cheapest petcam (metacam) oral suspension person to help prevent contracting the flu and any potentially alesse (ovral l) no prescription severe complications. Because the symptoms of an ankle sprain and cheap cipro a broken ankle are similar, people should consider contacting a cialis side effects doctor for a physical examination following any ankle injuries. Instead, buy diflucan generic they accumulate them in their tissues by eating microalgae and order cheap clomid online phytoplankton, which synthesize them. Although doctors cannot cure Hashimoto encephalopathy, order robaxin from us it is highly treatable and has a positive outlook. Proteins cheap toradol tablets in milk can help the body to get rid of lowest price for viagra excess uric acid, which may help lower uric acid levels viagra online sale in the blood and lessen the risk of gout flares. buy free viagra best price jelly If you and your doctor determine that Gemtesa is safe and.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.