Memespace Names and URNs

The approved prescription pharmacy researchers note that an insufficient whole grain intake and excessive purchase diflucan online consumption of refined rice, refined wheat, and processed meat may dexamethasone prescription significantly contribute to the condition. The SAD provides inadequate levels cheap estrace no prescription of micronutrients, which may lead to deficiencies in zinc and generic prozac Vitamins A, C, D, and E. Research also links SAD buy cheap erythromycin with health conditions such as obesity, heart disease, and stroke. flovent medicine When a stroke affects both occipital lobes rather than only order cheap asacol one, it can result in a complete loss of vision. buy cheapest online no prescription To illustrate, if the stroke affects the right occipital lobe, tetracycline online it will cause vision loss in the left visual field. buy generic clonidine In the United States, stroke is one of the top causes.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.