Memespace Names and URNs

Antibiotic buy cialis cheap overuse can potentially mean that there are also more antibiotics order allopurinol cheap online in the environment, for example, in landfills, in the water order azor supply, and in animals that people eat for food. Sleep order discount arcoxia online apnea describes a sleep disorder in which a person's breathing kenalog prescription stops and restarts many times during the night. The National buying generic cream Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) describes it as get professional a neurological disorder that affects a person's brain, making it viagra side effects difficult to control sleep-wake cycles. If someone cannot sleep, they buy aldactone may benefit from getting out of bed and engaging in prescription prices a quiet, low-light activity to help them feel tired. The specific.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.