Memespace Names and URNs

Gene lowest price toradol therapy often works by adding copies of a broken gene lowest price viagra or by replacing a defective or missing gene with a buy cialis no rx healthy version of that gene. Some people with ADHD also discount triamterene experience difficulties with working memory, or short-term memory, which can cephalexin for sale make it easier to forget things. Effectiveness, on the other augmentin for order hand, describes the performance of something in "real world" situations. glucophage sale There is no single test for OAB or CAC, so cheapest cialis price a doctor may recommend tests that look for an underlying pharmacy viagra cause. This camera uses high magnification and special lighting to without tizanidine get prescription discount take more detailed and better quality photos than other skin serevent online stores cancer apps. The base is wood and the flower is buy viagra internet porcelain, and the company states that adding essential oils provides unique.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.