Memespace Names and URNs

When order cheap online work symptoms do not present, a doctor may discover a pituitary buy cheap lasix online adenoma by accident during a CT scan. Often, it involves buy cafergot medications to correct hormone imbalances, radiation, or surgery to remove buy generic glucophage the adenoma. They affect an unknown number of people — buy nexium without prescription in part because they do not always cause symptoms or buy cheap asacol complications. They do not mean that someone has cancer, but buy in us people should speak to their doctor about any changes that get cheap price best price tablet occur in the mouth. In this emerging technique, a doctor augmentin no rx will heat the area above normal temperature to damage and buy discount buy sale jelly kill cancer cells. The outlook for a person with oral or.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.