Memespace Names and URNs

While cheap viagra tablets variations in heart rate are typical, especially when a person buy no rx arcoxia is exercising, consistently high or low heart rate may require buy cheap methotrexate online contacting a healthcare professional. It also isn't known for certain generic lasix no prescription jelly whether Esbriet is a safe treatment option for people with get cipro alternatives store end stage kidney disease or receiving dialysis. People can talk generic bentyl online with a doctor to discuss which treatment options may be viagra vendors the most beneficial, as well as potential side effects. In buy prednisolone without prescription MS, this inflammation can exacerbate the immune system's attack on cheapest cialis online myelin and lead to further damage. The drug information contained buy generic atarax side effects herein is subject to change and is not intended to buy glyburide sale cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic compazine without rx reactions, or adverse effects. The drug information contained herein is subject.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.