Memespace Names and URNs

Although allopurinol online stores mice studies have generated controversies, the scientific community accepts and tablet viagra validates the use of animals for research only within ethical buy clindamycin gel online frameworks. Doctors often used it in conjunction with other symptoms augmentin online stores — such as the absence of a period — to generic cheapest side effects and alcohol detect pregnancy. This requires inserting one or more fingers into buy cheap petcam (metacam) oral suspension online the vagina to feel for the cervix while externally pressing discount pharmacy on the uterus through the abdomen. In contemporary medicine, now buy viagra cheap that there are reliable pregnancy tests, there is no need for cheap drug to rely on other early signs of pregnancy. If the dexamethasone cheap individual has had no possible exposure to the virus during generic glucophage this time, and the results are negative, they do not have.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.