Memespace Names and URNs

It buy estrace vaginal cream without prescription stated that in preclinical studies, aged garlic extract showed wound cheap cialis no prescription healing potential depending on the dosage. Blood leaks out of purchase viagra overnight delivery these broken capillaries into the surrounding soft tissues, which causes buy cheap asacol alternative discoloration. Bruising can also develop alongside other types of injury, buy cheap for online usa such as fractures, broken bones, torn tendons, or dislocated joints. store get generic without clindamycin prescription Treatment for a fractured kneecap may involve surgery to repair cialis for order the broken bones or replacing all or part of the buy generic glyburide cost oral kneecap. However, injuries to this area of the tongue can compare cipro prices be more serious due to the presence of a major allopurinol price nerve. It is vital that people seek help as soon sale nexium get as possible for severe lacerations, particularly if the tongue is partially.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.