Memespace Names and URNs

Individuals viagra information will be able to apply for life insurance through the buying atrovent insurance company's website or call the company to speak to discount triamterene a representative. People with cancer can still get life insurance, buy cheap flagyl online but their options may depend on the type of the discount cialis disease cancer, stage, and whether they are receiving treatment or order discount online side effects effects in remission. However, even if an insurance provider appears on flovent the list, people will need to check their individual plan find compazine online to make sure it covers transgender care. It may be order online overnight delivery easier and more affordable to work with in-network providers, rather quinine sale than providers not in an insurance provider's network, TLDEF recommends. buy delivery low cost pharmacy The WPATH guidelines recommend one letter from a healthcare professional discount estrace vaginal cream for those seeking top surgery and two letters for those cialis professional seeking bottom surgery. This involves a surgeon negotiating a rate of.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.