Memespace Names and URNs

Seeking order cafergot a diagnosis can provide the tools for slowing disease progression viagra india and reducing the effects of symptoms on daily life. Evidence tizanidine for order suggests that MS may increase a person's body temperature, but buy cheap buy online it may also interfere with regular sweating. These treatments do generic artane online not modify the course of the disease, but they can buy generic provide relief from these symptoms. However, studies suggest that MS purchase petcam (metacam) oral suspension online may cause heat intolerance and issues with body temperature regulation find cialis no prescription required and sweat production. While some people may have mild to order atarax no symptoms, MS can progress rapidly, causing severe disability, in buying cheap celebrex side effects canada other people. Atherosclerosis causes the hardening of blood vessels and buy cheap levitra the formation of plaque blockages that may completely or partially obstruct.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.