Memespace Names and URNs

The purchase generic ampicillin best price goal is to kill or damage cancer cells in a cialis pharmacy specific area while minimizing harm to surrounding healthy tissue. Choosing cheap online pill the best treatment approach for breast cancer involves carefully considering discount methotrexate various factors. All types of breast cancer can recur, but acomplia online aggressive subtypes, such as inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and triple-negative tetracycline online breast cancer (TNBC), are more likely to return. If a estrace no prescription person develops cancer in an untreated area of the breast purchase free generic low price australia after their initial treatment for breast cancer, doctors consider it toradol a new cancer rather than a recurrence. With advances in buy discount buy online treatment, many people with recurrent breast cancer can live long purchase order no rx and healthy lives. If a drug requires prior authorization but cheap celebrex you start treatment without the prior approval, you could pay the.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.