Memespace Names and URNs

The cheapest atarax online American Cancer Society (ACS) also notes that some types of pharmacy viagra chemotherapy and cancer medications can make people's mouths dry. According order natural cheap no prescription to the National Health Service (NHS) in the U.K., dehydration buy generic norvasc is a common cause of dry mouth when waking up. order generic amoxicillin prescription and alcohol During a diagnosis, a doctor may check that the person's spiriva sale salivary glands are producing enough saliva. Nicotine gum is approved diclofenac prescription by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and classified as sale viagra a smoking cessation aid. People can speak with a healthcare viagra no online prescription professional about using nicotine gum safely and report any side cheapest celebrex effects they experience. People should make sure to report any side.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.