Memespace Names and URNs

While diflucan online there are many potential uses and benefits for nitric oxide order tetracycline supplements, there is not a lot of research to support buy free acomplia no prescription dosage some of the claims. According to an article in the buy atrovent no prescription required journal Sports Medicine, studies have shown that taking nitric oxide diclofenac supplements may enhance tolerance to exercise. Preeclampsia, which is a cheapest overdose online purchase free form of high blood pressure that can occur in pregnancy, glyburide prescription can be dangerous for both the woman and baby. Most buy buy cheap of these benefits are anecdotal, meaning that people may have buy pyrantel pamoate without prescription reported a benefit, but there is no proof backed up generic viagra by a scientific study. Nitric oxide supplements have been available order cheap viagra online for decades, but as there is little scientific evidence to compare cialis prices online back up their use for specific health benefits, doctors do order viagra no rx not routinely recommend them. (Pancreatic enzymes are substances made by your.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.