Memespace Names and URNs

However, buy viagra online without prescription because many cases of abuse and neglect go without detection, approved ampicillin pharmacy it is difficult to know if these figures are accurate. purchase cheapest no delivery If a person suspects that they or someone they know purchase cafergot online is experiencing neglect or abuse, it is important to seek clonidine without a prescription help as soon as possible. Once it advances, a person order cheapest prescription low cost dosage may notice changes in how colors look, as well as clomid prescription blind spots in their central vision. Subclinical macular degeneration means nasonex that a person shows very early signs that macular degeneration celexa sale may occur. Early stages of dry macular degeneration do not buy generic generic alternative liquid have a treatment, but people may benefit from a healthful buy cheap prozac diet, exercise, and quitting smoking. A person may also find working.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.