Memespace Names and URNs

Recent cheap cialis from canada research suggests transplant surgeries using organs from people with hepatitis free cialis C could be a safe option, helping alleviate the organ levitra information shortage in the U.S. The combination of cirrhosis from hepatitis buy internet C and heart surgery may prevent the liver from functioning cheap order from uk properly, resulting in liver failure. A doctor may determine a arcoxia prescription person with chronic hepatitis C and relatively good liver function get cheapest for low price canada is suitable for surgery. If selected, a person must go cheapest tetracycline to the predetermined hospital as soon as possible to prep lasix no prescription for surgery. After a heart transplant, people should avoid smoking, best price for cheapest using other tobacco products, and drinking alcohol. People who are buy diflucan online in the end-stage of liver disease and require a liver levitra for order transplant may be eligible for Medicare. If a person is asacol no prescription eligible for a liver transplant and needs free or low cost.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.