Memespace Names and URNs

While buy cheap prescription online some people use kinetic tape to flatten their chests, this order no rx cialis practice is not safe, and healthcare professionals advise against it. cheapest acomplia It is important for them to bind safely, as practicing drug buy improper techniques can lead to health problems. Penile skin can cialis purchase also contract HPV, which can lead to a transgender woman buy 60 overnight delivery developing cancer in the neo-cervix or neo-vagina. As a result, fda approved cafergot a person may wish to speak with a healthcare professional order discount erythromycin about any cancer screenings they may need. The American Cancer buy cheap nasonex online Society advises people to make a joint decision with a buy cheap buy online healthcare professional on whether they should get a screening, based on.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.