Memespace Names and URNs

In low cost flagyl this study, people were more likely to stop taking Topamax cialis canada than Botox due to side effects or because the drug buy mirapex online wasn't working well enough to help prevent migraine headaches. Botox cafergot order and Topamax may not be right for you if you discount mirapex have certain medical conditions or other factors that affect your buy generic viagra online health. For more comprehensive information about these two drugs, you buy cheap cheap can refer to our Botox and Topamax articles. You should cheap cialis pharmacy always consult your doctor or another healthcare professional before taking generic serevent any medication. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus occurs when a person experiences buy amikacin without prescription an absence seizure or a complex partial seizure but does not.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.