Memespace Names and URNs

Possible discount levitra complications include the leakage of calcium phosphate to other tissues methotrexate prescription in the joint may occur during the procedure. Scoliosis braces buy tizanidine are most effective when the spine is growing, so doctors buy cialis on internet prescribe them most often for children and adolescents. A doctor find cialis no prescription required can recommend the most beneficial brace type and schedule based order diclofenac on a person's spinal curve. It may also be ok arcoxia sale to take the occasional short break from wearing a brace, lowest price advair such as for a school dance or a sleepover at buy glyburide without prescription a friend's house. Pelvic bone cancer can cause pain, swelling, buy arcoxia online and reduced mobility, affecting a person's overall quality of life. compazine prescription Although bone pain or tenderness can be due to other causes,.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.