David Weinberger on Metadata

You vibramycin prescription should always consult your doctor or another healthcare professional before buy generic celexa taking any medication. If a drug requires prior authorization but buy generic cheap alternative liquid you start treatment without the prior approval, you could pay best price buy the full cost of the medication. Talk with your doctor find viagra no prescription required or pharmacist, who can provide personalized guidance about cost issues pyrantel pamoate online related to Caplyta. The drug information contained herein is subject buy buy drug to change and is not intended to cover all possible discount buy side effects usa uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse cheap without prescription effects. The risk was moderately higher for people who had order viagra no rx previously smoked than those who had never smoked. While the buy cheap amikacin study cannot strictly prove that smoking causes mental illness, it best price atrovent does indicate a possible causal relationship. "Now, there is growing atenolol order evidence that the clear association between smoking and mental health purchase generic discount alternatives problems may — again, in part — be due to smoking being.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)