David Weinberger on Metadata

This asacol for order means that ignoring someone with HPD may cause them to purchase buy best price professional have a strong emotional reaction and possibly increase their attention-seeking diflucan behavior. Researchers do not know for sure what causes HPD, purchase generic (metacam) alternatives problems but is likely a combination of factors, including experiences of drug viagra online purchase childhood trauma and certain parenting styles. Those with HPD may celexa for order constantly attempt to become the center of attention, feel they celebrex online stores need to entertain everyone around them, and express their emotions diflucan in a dramatic way. The intention of someone using the buy zoloft without prescription gray rock method is to make the person lose interest order generic cialis in interacting with them or trying to get their attention. spiriva sale HPD is a personality disorder that can cause a person buy generic advair alternative liquid to display exaggerated emotions and engage in attention-seeking behavior. Understanding amoxicillin online the risk factors associated with personality disorders is essential for buy acomplia in us recognizing and preventing these conditions. The outlook for a person purchase zithromax online with a personality disorder depends on several factors, including the specific.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)