David Weinberger on Metadata

We purchase diflucan online all can work toward becoming more educated about the experiences buy cheap zyprexa online of Multiracial people and aware of how the Monoracial paradigm viagra in malaysia of U.S. society erroneously forces people into one racial category. buy robaxin overnight delivery Some states recognize advance directives from other states, but the buy viagra low cheap price NHPCO recommend that anyone who spends a lot of time buy discount advair without prescription info in more than one state prepare advance directives in each. buy cheap viagra internet Early recognition and appropriate management are essential to prevent asthma order cheap celebrex online symptoms from worsening and decrease the risk of developing severe buy discount cialis online asthma with FAO. During this phase, a person may not buy free erythromycin best price jelly be thinking about using, but they may experience thoughts and get colchicine behaviors that ultimately lead them toward reuse. Gray matter makes online celexa up the outside layer of the brain and is responsible lipitor us for movement control, recalling and storing memories, and processing emotions. cheap retin-a They can give you additional details and help determine the best.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)