David Weinberger on Metadata

CyberKnife t-ject 60 also features cameras and sensors, which help it further minimize without erythromycin get prescription discount damage to surrounding healthy tissue. People should work with a buy cheap diflucan medical team to identify the right type of treatment for triamterene discount buy online info their specific circumstances. People typically recover quickly from SBRT treatments generic ampicillin prescription professional and are able to resume daily activities after treatment. Prostate order ampicillin cancer is the most common form of cancer in people order cheap cialis online assigned male at birth in the United States. If a buy cheap amikacin online person with prostate cancer is at high risk, it means purchase bentyl online they have a tumor that extends outside of the prostate. buy cheap compazine Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) describes the protein that both healthy and estrace online stores cancerous prostate cells produce. If a person has recently received purchase generic order alternatives problems a prostate cancer diagnosis that is moderate to high risk, clindamycin buy online they should consider a PSMA PET scan. Most of the buying no online emotional side effects of low androgen levels will eventually go purchase mirapex online away when someone stops hormone therapy. Orchiectomy (surgical castration) decreases androgens.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)