David Weinberger on Metadata

Doctors buy norvasc sale often give chemotherapy intravenously, orally, or through a catheter into purchase generic tetracycline side effects and alcohol the abdominal cavity. A surgeon may be able to create buy nasonex low price a new bladder, or neobladder, from a portion of the remeron pharmacy online small intestine. Prostaglandins are lipids, or fatty substances, that play atenolol no prescription a role in the body's inflammatory response. This article explains bentyl no prescription how CBD products, including CBD gummy bears, might be beneficial purchase bentyl online for people for COPD. The tattooing process can worsen or clonidine without a prescription trigger underlying skin conditions, such as eczema or psoriasis. For advair sale example, a small ventricular septal abnormality may not require treatment viagra discount buy online info if it causes no noticeable symptoms. Open communication about sleep-related lowest price for remeron fears or anxieties can help to develop a supportive environment colchicine for order and reduce feelings of isolation. With the right support and purchase cheapest norvasc no prescription tablets treatment, a person can have a positive relationship with food buy allopurinol without prescription and modify their eating patterns. The drug information contained herein is.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)