David Weinberger on Metadata

The flagyl in australia prevalence of Alzheimer's disease in people with Down syndrome is buy compare generic significantly higher than in the general population. Early symptoms of buy cheap cheap internet Alzheimer's disease in people with Down syndrome may manifest as buy cheap serevent online a reduced interest in social interactions and conversations and a buy zoloft online decreased enthusiasm for activities they once enjoyed. Ongoing research aims purchase discount work to decipher the mechanisms underlying this link, with the hope information no buy prescription buy cheap of developing interventions to delay or mitigate the effects of discount levitra Alzheimer's disease in people with Down syndrome. As the LLS buy levitra without prescription makes clear, even people with a family history of CLL buy prescription from india have only a small risk of developing it. When someone generic kenalog comes into contact with a trigger, they may develop a buy cheap lumigan online psoriasis flare that begins as a small patch and eventually vibramycin for order spreads. Keeping skin moisturized and avoiding psoriasis triggers, when possible, artane sale may also help people manage their psoriasis flares. Sticking to a.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)