David Weinberger on Metadata

They cialis buy drug might have to become familiar with new equipment, undergo surgery, compazine without prescription learn sign language and lip reading, and use various communication cheap bentyl devices. This has led some people to speculate that eating viagra malaysia pineapple or taking bromelain supplements, could help with digestive conditions. buy griseofulvin pills Here's information about the generic and biosimilar status of Xeljanz buy diflucan without prescription and Humira, as well as details on their active ingredients. side effects purchase kenalog cheap Which contraception method to use is a personal choice, and generic serevent different options work for different people. This causes someone to toradol online have a form of dystrophin that doesn't work properly, or glyburide no prescription they may not have any dystrophin at all. However, the discount cephalexin Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves the use of gabapentin nexium cheap price and pregabalin for the treatment of PHN. With this condition, buy ampicillin without prescription you may have peeling and discoloration of your skin over get discount ampicillin large areas of your body. This includes individuals who require canadian erythromycin over-the-counter heartburn medication more than twice each week. According to the.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)