David Weinberger on Metadata

Some generic aldactone people mark their grids to highlight the areas of distortion, order buy no prescription required while others prefer to note things as a list.Repeat the discount prescription no rx test for the other eye. Some animal studies have demonstrated purchase cialis online the possibility of CRISPR gene editing in restoring visual loss. viagra online Clinical trials on humans are currently investigating its use in order generic flagyl correcting a form of inherited blindness called Leber congenital amaurosis clindamycin gel online stores (LCA). In view of these possible risks of CRISPR gene lasix side effects pill editing, caution is crucial for safety, ethical, and social reasons. purchase cheap for low cost consultation Therefore, cautious use is critical, and more research evidence is kenalog online necessary to conclude its safety and efficacy in humans. However, synthroid online stores in order to measure the extent of someone's exotropia, doctors buy free buy may rely on more sophisticated methods. Scientists are not sure canadian pharmacy order about the exact causes of exotropia, although neurological conditions and purchase overnight abnormalities in the skull can be contributing factors. Medical professionals gentamicin eye drops online stores typically recommend other types of treatment, such as intravitreal injections. Smoking.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)