David Weinberger on Metadata

Izervay cialis in uk may not be right for you if you have certain drug viagra online purchase medical conditions or other factors affecting your health. A medical buy generic glyburide professional can administer IV medications as a single dose or diclofenac prescription as an infusion over a period of many hours. You best price glucophage should always consult your doctor or another healthcare professional before order viagra online taking any medication. Medical News Today has made every effort viagra online without a prescription to make certain that all information is factually correct, comprehensive, order generic serevent prescription and alcohol and up to date. These were common insertion side effects cialis discount reported in Paragard's clinical trials, and were mild to moderate buy compazine online in severity. Even if a person does not qualify for buy augmentin SSA benefits, they may have other options, such as workplace glucophage sale disability programs, worker's compensation, or income insurance, if they have diclofenac without prescription it. Mifepristone is a generic drug, which is an exact methotrexate without prescription copy of the active drug in a brand-name medication. By increasing.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)