David Weinberger on Metadata

PFFS buy mirapex without prescription plans are not allowed to charge more than original Medicare colchicine no prescription for some kinds of care, such as chemotherapy, dialysis, and buy remeron care that someone receives in a skilled nursing facility. Health purchase 60 without prescription Maintenance Organization (HMO) plans are usually less expensive than other order cafergot online Medicare Advantage plans because they use a network of contracted buy generic generic no prescription usa healthcare professionals, hospitals, and clinics. Some individuals may prefer a purchase nasonex online PFFS plan because they do not have to choose a canadian pharmacy discount PCP, and they can see a specialist without a referral. generic tizanidine In both palliative and hospice care, professionals strive to provide buying cheap find side effects canada people with care that makes them comfortable. Anyone who thinks zithromax prescription that they might benefit from this kind of integrative care zoloft sale can talk to their doctor or access the online Palliative cheap zithromax Care Provider Directory. A person can purchase a standalone policy generic betnovate which covers Part D prescription drugs, or add the PDP to.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)