David Weinberger on Metadata

Schizophrenia advair for sale is a mental health condition that affects a person's thinking, buy artane canada feelings, and behavior. Healthcare and mental health professionals diagnose a overnight kenalog person with STPD if they meet five out of nine atarax prescription criteria. This means they affect a person's thoughts, feelings, and buy generic prescription online behaviors in every aspect of their lives over a long spiriva sale period of time. Their fear of rejection limits how much online without rx they are willing to share about themselves, which inhibits their cialis overnight delivery ability to form relationships. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) vibramycin no prescription has not approved any medications specifically for AvPD, but anecdotal purchase discount 60 sale reports suggest that drugs for social anxiety disorder (SAD) may cheap vibramycin help reduce symptoms. Some autistic people find socializing difficult or t-ject 60 no prescription tiring, while others may enjoy it but have negative experiences find cheap (ovral online due to the prejudice or ignorance of others. People with buy petcam (metacam) oral suspension online SPD do not seek out relationships due to disinterest, whereas buy cheapest drops on line those with APD may want relationships, but have a fear of.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)