David Weinberger on Metadata

Though diflucan online review it can affect all people, those assigned female at birth canadian pharmacy cephalexin have a higher chance of developing a UTI than others. acomplia online stores They come with a sensor, transmitters, and receivers or display cheap viagra from uk units that provide regular reports, real-time data to an app buy lumigan from india or connected device, or a combination of both. The treatment buy viagra from india plan for hyperthyroidism must include strategies to prevent weight gain, buy cheapest norvasc online and people can discuss these with a doctor. In addition celexa side effects pill to being a highly-effective, long-acting form of contraception, IUDs offer purchase norvasc a range of benefits. the FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology atenolol for sale and Obstetrics) system and the AJCC (American Joint Committee on find cialis no prescription required Cancer) TNM staging system. Depending on the size of the dexamethasone sale swelling, the PLGA cells could grow and compress surrounding tissues lipitor online stores in the oral cavity or face. However, traditional medicine practitioners have.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)