David Weinberger on Metadata

Nevertheless, discount viagra it is unusual for doctors to recommend allogeneic stem cell order cheapest amoxicillin no prescription consultation transplantation for MM, although a person may wish to participate lowest price atarax in clinical trials for this treatment. When the individual recovers buy amikacin from the treatment, doctors can reintroduce the removed stem cells get cheapest dexamethasone low price canada to their body. A person may wish to discuss the buy online sale pros and cons of ASCT with their doctor before deciding estradiol valerate online stores to undergo this treatment. Due to these factors and advances purchase free buy low price australia in the diagnosis and therapeutics, many definitions exist for people in medication with high risk multiple myeloma. Triplet therapy refers to the order free advair alternative withdrawal administration of an immunomodulatory drug, a proteasome inhibitor drug, and estradiol online review a steroid. This is a type of immunotherapy that targets cafergot online specific antigens that are heavily present in cancer cells. This amikacin prescription involves cytogenetic tests and gene expression profiling to better understand cheapest zithromax the biology of the disease. Autologous transplants use cells from buy online overnight delivery the person themselves, while allogenic transplants use cells from someone else..

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)