David Weinberger on Metadata

The viagra prescription authors found that it is effective in reducing pain and generic online increasing function as a stand-alone treatment. However, the new research buy cheap asacol alternative indicates that the microglia themselves are destroyed in the process kenalog online of eliminating iron-laden myelin, through a type of cell death order cheap cheapest sale dosage called ferroptosis. "If iron toxicity is responsible for cell death buy generic buy best price and negative impact, myelin repair targeted therapies of this pathway methotrexate for order could impact how we treat Alzheimer's and vascular dementia. "Given buy vibramycin online that these are two of the most common types of cheap viagra internet dementia in general, having a new avenue for investigation is purchase cheap estrace sale overdose of the utmost importance," Dr. Kentris explained. "I'd be interested buy free (ovral if similar findings of ferroptosis could be identified in other buy drug demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis," Dr. Davé also noted. buy cheap lasix In this instance, a rush of oxytocin — a hormone compazine prescription involved in contraction and lactation — may be causing cramps. order for Changing pads as often as possible is vital, as bacteria can.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)