David Weinberger on Metadata

Instead, buy remeron sale they provide counseling to discourage or limit access to abortion buy cheap (metacam) services and manipulate through deception to get people to consider order lipitor without prescription parenting or adoption as better options. If you're not sure nexium no prescription whether you'll need prior authorization for aripiprazole, contact your insurance order free griseofulvin alternative withdrawal company. Some more sensitive patients may receive a subconjunctival injection, best price for viagra which is when the doctor injects an anesthetic in addition compazine prescription to numbing eye drops. I stopped believing in the power buy asacol no rx of God and religion, and I started focusing more on lowest price viagra the self and less on the external, such as people, generic viagra places, or things. This type of planning may help alleviate order natural viagra no prescription unnecessary pain and discomfort, improve quality of life, and provide cialis non prescription a better understanding of decision-making challenges for a person and viagra for sale their caregivers. If you have insurance, your insurance company may order aldactone require prior authorization before it covers Ritalin. Dr. Tadwalkar described ventolin for order the value of cool-air breaks "that help your body regulate things.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)