David Weinberger on Metadata

Invasive buy estradiol in us cervical cancer is highly treatable, and the general outlook for estradiol valerate prescription people with the disease is good. Screening programs are vital metronidazole gel sale for detecting cancers at earlier stages when treatment options are quinine without prescription more effective. Anyone with a family history of cancer should zyprexa prescription discuss their screening and preventive options with a doctor. Brachytherapy purchase cialis no rx involves implanting a radiation source that is sealed inside an order viagra in us implant, which may be a ribbon, seed, pellet, capsule, balloon, buy generic buy online or other vessel. A doctor will typically implant the radiation gentamicin eye drops without prescription source in a hospital operating room designed to contain radiation. clindamycin cheap drug A person may feel temporarily weak, drowsy, or nauseous during clomid online review treatment due to the drugs doctors use while they place order no lowest price dosage the implants. Brachytherapy, in combination with external beam radiation therapy, buy estrace without prescription can improve a person's outlook for cervical cancer. The National asacol online sale Cancer Institute (NCI) recommends routine cervical cancer screening for anyone discount celexa overnight delivery with a cervix. The purpose of CCA Month is to increase.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)