David Weinberger on Metadata

People buy cheap atarax online who experience frequent bouts of acute bronchitis might benefit from glyburide overnight delivery talking with a healthcare professional. The sections below will discuss discount t-ject 60 the various treatment options for sickle cell disease in more cephalexin online stores detail. High blood pressure, or hypertension, is a medical condition viagra from canada where the pressure in a person's arteries is persistently high. order asacol Therefore, it may seem logical that the more bees there buy colchicine are, the better it is for the natural environment. Randomization discount zoloft removes bias and truly allows for a direct comparison between buy clindamycin online cheap two groups in a trial, providing a real representation of cheapest atarax online how the drug will react with the wider population after information no clindamycin prescription buy cheap distribution. Reducing refined carbohydrates and increasing consumption of healthy fats, drug nexium online purchase such as avocados and nuts, can also help promote weight low price zoloft loss and reduce belly fat. Taking antidepressants, such as Effexor buy viagra pills XR, may increase the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. buy generic arcoxia It is important to work with a doctor to determine the.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)